RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?

Mon Jan 1 06:30:03 UTC 2001

I said:
> >Nevertheless, the operational reality is that having a traceroute that
> >shows RFC1918 addresses is more useful than a traceroute that shows
> >* * *, and therefore I suspect most operators will continue to permit
> >RFC1918 addresses into their networks as long as a few questionable
> >individuals use them to source traffic.
> 
> i think it's only useful to show that (a) something's there

Yes, and that's sufficient justification for me. I don't particularly
like traffic filters.

--jhawk