64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question - how do work around...]

Tue Feb 27 23:59:18 UTC 2001

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:33:05PM -0500, Daniel Golding wrote:
> There are plenty of folks who have space in 64/8. However, no one should be
> classfully advertising 64.0.0.0/8, as it has not been assigned to any single
> entity.

Ever have one of those days where you bang your head against recalcitrant
users who don't understand why a Fortune 100 corporation would need
security policies all day, then come home and say something stupid on
a (inter)national mailing list where hundreds of people you might find the
desire to work for some day will read it?

:-/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010227/1bc2785f/attachment.sig>