Next NANOG

Tue Feb 27 00:32:15 UTC 2001

There were about 650 registered for the last one. I'm not sure how many
showed up. Network stats indicated that over 400 individual DHCP addresses
were in use at any one time.

The problem is meeting room size, and the concept of multiple tracks. Is
there enough material to have multiple tracks? Is it desirable at all? It
has seemed to work well for the tutorials. Might be an interesting
experiment for the next NANOG.

Daniel L. Golding               dan at netrail.net

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Christian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Rodney Caston
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: Next NANOG

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Rodney Caston wrote:

> Vegas would be nice :)

which allow Nanog to allow more people to go. Has there been talk about
allowing more then 500 to attend?

>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > TBA - which from what I heard means there's a probable but not firm
yet...
> >
> > joelja
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Was the date/place of the next NANOG announced in Atlanta?
> > >
> > > Pete.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Joel Jaeggli
joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu
> > Academic User Services
consult at gladstone.uoregon.edu
> >      PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of
> > arms.  Karl Marx -- Introduction to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy
of
> > the right, 1843.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>