rfc 1918?

Fri Feb 23 19:40:52 UTC 2001

On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:28:07AM -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
> 
> indeed.  i fought with uunet a couple of years ago about this.  after
> about a dozen phone calls, countless emails (including a few megabytes
> of packet dumps), and who knows how many people, i finally reached
> someone at uunet who was willing to say "no, we don't filter that
> stuff and no, we aren't going to".

I'm tempted to buy one share of stock, then show up a shareholders' meeting and
complain about the (probable) fact that they spend more money arguing with people
about this than it would cost them to start filtering it at the borders.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010223/38f0f764/attachment.sig>