[NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?

Mark Radabaugh mark at amplex.net
Fri Feb 23 01:06:26 UTC 2001

Previous message (by thread): [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?
Next message (by thread): duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]


> 
> Would routing them to Null0 not be more optimal?
> 
> Pi
> 

Hum...  Now there is a good idea!

Thanks,

Mark

Previous message (by thread): [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?
Next message (by thread): duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the NANOG mailing list