rfc 1918?

Thu Feb 22 21:18:36 UTC 2001

On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:12:16 EST, John Hawkinson said:

> There are good reasons to want to get those packets (traceroutes from
> people who have numbered their networks in rfc1918 networks, f'rinstance).

The original note specifically showed them as being TCP packets from
a 10.x.x.x address going to port 80.  Does that qualify as a good reason?

> Not everyone agrees whether it is better to filter or not to filter,
> but there are good arguments on both sides.

Does anybody in the house think that these packets actually have a snowball's
chance in Hades of getting a reply back sucessfully?

-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010222/f06bffa4/attachment.sig>