Peering contract, needed or optional?

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Feb 20 20:56:43 UTC 2001


On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:24:57AM +0100, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote:
> I just had a discussion with our legal advisor whether it is necessary or
> not to sign a peering contract with every (little) peering partner.
> 
> I know that a lot of the big ones require these contracts and I don't have
> a problem with that, my opinion just is that a contract with a peer who
> announces one /19 is not really necessary.

	Today's Opnix is tomorrow's UUNet, and it's easier to get the
contract when they are small to use as a hammer when they are big.

	Ok, I just tried three times, I can't say that sentence without
laughing, but it makes my point. :-)

-- 
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org




More information about the NANOG mailing list