Minimum globally routable address space?
Paul Schultz
PSchultz at corp.darwin.net
Tue Feb 20 19:14:42 UTC 2001
If you're going to get a /20, I'd say get your own from ARIN. The biggest
pain of a routing policy I've had to deal with (as far as other people's
policies go) is Verio, who only accepts /20 and greater for all of the
recently opened legacy class A networks (64., 65., 66 etc)
As long as you don't try to slice and dice your /20's into more specific
blocks to come out of other places, you'll be fine.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Streufert [mailto:dans at icss.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:34 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Minimum globally routable address space?
I am writing from a small, multi-homed ISP. We are contemplating
terminating our relationship with one of our providers, and will need to
replace that non-portable space.
We are debating between getting a /20 from ARIN (we have justifiable usage)
or a /20 from our other provider.
On one hand, portability would be nice. On the other, is a /20 globally
routable in practice? I seem to remember hearing that /19 was the smallest
that would not be filtered by anyone.
If anyone knows if there are filters for /20s out there, I would be
interested to know who filters them.
Thanks,
Dan Streufert
More information about the NANOG
mailing list