multi-homing fixes
Tony Hain
alh-ietf at tndh.net
Fri Aug 31 21:38:31 UTC 2001
Sean M. Doran wrote:
> Let me take some of your text out of context and agree with it fully:
>
> [A permanently stable holes-in-CIDR-blocks environment exists]
> | Only if there is a limit on the number of ISPs. I don't think there
> | is such a [practical rather than absolute] limit
>
> The problem with metro-based addressing is that the statement
> above is equally true for it as for PA addressing.
>
Understanding the truth in that general statement,
I would like to know if anyone sees a significant
difference in the number of holes created by each
approach. Handwaving can go either way, so the
question is given real topologies and multi-homing
goals, is there enough difference in the number
of holes created to bias the approach?
Responses should go to multi6 at ops.ietf.org
Tony
More information about the NANOG
mailing list