multi-homing fixed
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Wed Aug 29 18:32:07 UTC 2001
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
> > how many providers have multiple POP's in a city that are _completely
> > redundant_? That is, they can operate _fully_ with one POP out of
> > service?
> none can operate *fully*, as a customer access line pretty much has to
> terminate in a single router which can, and eventually will, fail.
> but, most large providers have more than one pop in the largest cities,
> bay area, nyc, dee cee, etc. and those pops are redundantly and diversely
> wired. if not, don't buy from them. life can be simple.
So we don't want to force networks in the default-free zone to buy bigger
routers with more memory, but it's ok to force them to essentially build a
second network by having redundant pops in every city?
I'm sure the router vendors and colo builders would love this idea, but I
don't think throwing hardware at the problem will help in the long run.
Iljitsch van Beijnum
More information about the NANOG
mailing list