multi-homing fixes
Sean M. Doran
smd at clock.org
Tue Aug 28 15:41:40 UTC 2001
"David Schwartz" <davids at webmaster.com> writes:
| I'm not sure I believe that this tragedy of the commons exists where people
| route on allocation boundaries. If I make Sprint carry an extra route just
| for my little network, that helps all Sprint customers reach my little
| network.
Cool, so you can get them to contribute a fraction of the 50 cents you owe me?
Since I live downstream from Sprint, I tell you what: I'll give you
the first flap for free. And that's a generous offer, given that
your little network represents approximately zero percent of my traffic,
and I doubt I'll be complaining to my other personalities that I can't
get at your fascinating content without subsidizing your network's
globally-visible dynamicism.
Sean. (who does, incidentally, subscribe to some pay-for-play
web sites, for example, which helps them pay for a part of THEIR
dynamicism. i must remember to ask for a 50 cent * n discount
at renewal time...)
P.S.: the point here, since it's easy to miss, is that a clearing house
function is useful for containing complexity of negotiation, and
is currently being done by the RIRs on behalf of their owners
business opportunity: a tool which reliably lets one decide if
prefix x is worth carrying in all its flapping glory, or whether
it should be bitbucketed until a bill is paid
More information about the NANOG
mailing list