multi-homing fixes
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Sat Aug 25 00:16:00 UTC 2001
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:51:15PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Now on the other hand by saying "and if it's smaller then a /20 you will
> > be filtered" you cause undue pressure on people to "spin" their designs in
> > ways to show that they can use a /20 and get the allocation from ARIN
> > directly.
>
> you mean not use nat? should i be broken-hearted?
Great. I use NAT. I have a single IP address, can't get much
better than that.
How do I multihome with my /32?
This is a serious question, several large web sites are a single
IP that is translated by "nat"; load balancers actually. If you
want to argue everyone should use NAT, you need to do that hand in
hand with a method for making smaller allocations multi-home capable,
or you've only solved half the problem, and thus have a useless
solution.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
More information about the NANOG
mailing list