multi-homing fixes

Vijay Gill vgill at vijaygill.com
Thu Aug 23 23:20:48 UTC 2001


Daniel Hagerty <hag at linnaean.org> writes:


>     Please don't confuse "I need more than one pipe into the internet"
> with "my organization must place its prefixes into the default free
> zone".
> 
> 
>     It is possible to effectively use multiple pipes into many ISPs
> without the cost to all of us that introducing your prefix into the
> DFZ has.

I am all ears as to how you propose I achieve provider independence
without introducing my prefix(es) into the DFZ.

eg, say I am connected to two upstreams, I would like to still
continue reachability with the global net in case of failure of one of
the upstreams (as wide failure), or a failure of an upstream POP
(which happens to be the only one in my LATA) from one of the
providers.


/vijay




More information about the NANOG mailing list