Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)
Greg Maxwell
gmaxwell at martin.fl.us
Thu Aug 23 15:37:09 UTC 2001
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > If NAPs do not support jumbos, then end systems will never support them.
>
> Many end systems will never support jumbo frames, period. There are
> lots of 10/100 Mb/s ethernet hosts that will not ever be upgraded.
While not a standard feature, many 100mbit nics support jumbo on
full-duplex links and some 100tx switches do as well.
> Certainly. In a nutshell, it might be best to take steps to avoid
> fragmentation elsewhere in the network. Perhaps a rule of thumb that
> should be stressed is to use jumbo frames if you know for sure the other
> end system(s) support it, otherwise default to 1500.
Path MTU discovery works fine. (except for broken firewalls) Your
complaint about end systems never supporting jumbos is a moot point
because if neither end supports them, then PMTU discovery isn't even an
issue.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list