Routescience?
Vadim Antonov
avg at exigengroup.com
Thu Aug 23 00:03:39 UTC 2001
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Kavi, Prabhu wrote:
> I would like to hear it too. However, in fairness to Routescience,
> did anyone on NANOG previously ask Cisco and Juniper to publicly
> talk about everything they (sometimes painfully) learned about
> how to create resilient IS-IS/OSPF/BGP implementations? And even
> if anyone would ask, are Cisco and Juniper likely to respond
> (thereby giving a heads up to their competitors)?
To the credit of Cisco and (later) Juniper IP routing folks, they always
were in a very close touch with ISP backbone engineers. Cisco in
particular publishes quite a lot of technical information.
Which explais why their (and not their competitors) boxes are used to run
the Internet.
> Routescience may or may not have something worthwhile. However,
> I would respect their perogative to not say much more on the
> NANOG mailing list.
Of course.
--vadim
More information about the NANOG
mailing list