MPLS VPNs or not?

Robert Raszuk raszuk at cisco.com
Tue Aug 7 15:37:11 UTC 2001


Randy,

For me you can complain to vedors that they make crappy boxes which
don't do what you need. That is fine and I will not say a one bad word
against it. 

On the other hand I (helping to deploy mpls-vpns around the world for a
few years in a number of networks including these days even your ATT)
just can't watch stating that the arcitecture of 2547 is screwed only
because current platforms don't scale 5 years ahead.

R.

> Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > 5 years from now you will see routers from multiple vedors allowing you
> > to store & process orders of mangnitute of more routes.
> 
> good, because i will need them for the normal default-free zone.
> 
> but today, the vendors seem to think i need massively more routers to
> support this grotty hack.  and i suspect that you'll be telling me i
> still need that whoileparallel network five years from now.
> 
> randy



More information about the NANOG mailing list