cerf/att.net peering and or transit issues?

Fri Apr 27 02:38:18 UTC 2001

The downtime was considerable. It was described as a "catastrophic 
failure". No exact details of exactly what happened, but appearently
something more significant than the average fiber cut, to judge by the
length of time between techs arriving on site, and the eventual repair. 

Daniel Golding   NetRail,Inc.
"Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Ball"

On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Seth H Holmes wrote:

> FYI: They've given a 7PM EDT repair. And I'm seeing our fiber with them
> coming up right about now.
> 
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Daniel Golding wrote:
> 
> >
> > This was (and is) a major Broadwing fiber cut.
> >
> > - Daniel Golding
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> > > Sean Donelan
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:24 PM
> > > To: jade.deane at HelloNetwork.com
> > > Cc: nanog at merit.edu
> > > Subject: Re: cerf/att.net peering and or transit issues?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There was a fiber cut about that time, which may be affecting
> > > routing and transit in various cross-country networks.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 April 2001, "Jade E. Deane" wrote:
> > > > Anyone experiencing issues transiting or peering with legacy cerf.net?
> > > >
> > > > Started noticing issues around 2:30pm PDT
> > > >
> > > > Jade
> > > >
> > > > Jade E. Deane
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > helloNetwork
> > > > Las Vegas, Nevada
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> -------------------------------------
> Seth H Holmes
> sholmes at route-fu.net	ICQ# 10085439
> http://www.route-fu.net
> 
> "I believe a self-righteous liberal with a cause is more dangerous
> than a Hell's Angel with an attitude." -- author unknown
> 
> |  /"\
> |  \ /   ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
> |   X    AGAINST HTML MAIL
> |  / \   AND POSTINGS
> 