Cooler servers for the Internet

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Mon Apr 23 15:56:51 UTC 2001


On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:39:01 PDT, Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com>  said:

> I'm not very interested in who really has the coolest, most efficient
> computers.  I am interested in getting accurate information for planning
> purposes.  If this leads to computer vendors publishing more accurate
> information, great.  I'm afraid instead, the pendulum will swing the
> other direction and vendors will begin understating their true power
> requirements.

I don't have numbers handy for the IBM boxes, but note that the p680
can go 6 to 24 CPU, and from 4G to 96G of RAM.  Hardly a case where
one number will fit all.  IBM at least *used* to provide power info
on a per-component basis, but you had to get the 'Site Planning and
Preparation' manual for the system in question.  I also know that SGI
has information on amperage considerations for their O2K,  Onyx and Onyx2
rack-mount servers, where you *can* get into the situation where you
have open slots, but be unable to put a high-draw card in because
the power supply for the cage isn't rated for it.

The only way to get "more accurate" info is to line-item each component
and add up the numbers for *your* configuration.

-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010423/ba105956/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list