I'm guessing someone fat-fingered their AS prepend policy and instead of "6259 6259" they have "6259 6295". Gotta love that route preference manipulation flexibility of BGP! Interesting timing, considering kc just sent a message to the IRTF-RR list a few days ago discussing another occurrence of this... -danny > 63.69.155.0/24 : PATH = : 1239 3549 6259 6295 6259 11548