Getting a "portable" /19 or /20
Roeland Meyer
rmeyer at mhsc.com
Tue Apr 10 17:30:38 UTC 2001
> From: Patrick Evans [mailto:pre at pre.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:22 AM
> On the flipside, who is actually less concerned about routing table
> size? The multihomed networks on the edges who can use a default if
> they want to, and are likely to be carrying less traffic and so have
> more resources to deal with routing, or the core networks who have
> capacity problems of their own?
AFAICT, multi-homing doesn't work unless you also have dynamic routing. Is
this wrong?
More information about the NANOG
mailing list