Getting a "portable" /19 or /20

Mon Apr 9 22:18:33 UTC 2001

> I looked, they had the same price-tag as a /20 or /19. The price isn't the
> issue, though ... routing *is*. Qualifying for a /20, when you only really
> need a /24, is a PITA (not to mention, leaving you feeling a bit sleazy).

I understand the issue of "it costs just as much administration overhead
as a /24 as a /20", and there is probably some more overhead for more
addresses. It also raises the bar.. do they REALLY need it?

It's #1 on tomorrows (and the next several weeks) agenda - Thanks --Mike--