AS Leakage

Thu Apr 5 02:25:38 UTC 2001

On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Darrin Walton wrote:

> 	Do you honestly think, a company like Exodus would only have one
> path to 701?  Regardless of who said Exodus did, why would you not believe
> it?

Did I say I didn't believe it?  I said I didn't realize he worked for
exodus.  Had I known that, I wouldn't have suggested that if he filters
_701_ from his other connections, he would lose 701 connectivity in the
event that his 701 connection went down.

> 
>   |+ As for paths into 701, we three.  All of them > DS3.
> 
> 	Quite funny, why do I not see 13944 behind 701?  (I mean, I could
> go 701 -> 6347 -> 13944, or 6259 -> 13944, but not 701 -> 13944).  Is
> something wrong on your side?

There is nothing wrong on my side.  We're not a direct peer of 701.  I
never said I did.  I do have paths into 701 however.  You didn't specify
direct 701_13944.

>   |+ Have a nice day Darrin.
> 
> 	having a great day, how about yourself?
> 
> -- 
> darrin walton, darrinw at nixc.net
> 

---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc