a different view of SNMP

bandregg at redhat.com bandregg at redhat.com
Sun Sep 5 13:46:43 UTC 1999

On Sat, 04 Sep 1999 19:49:14 PDT, "Ron Buchalski" wrote: 
>>I sometimes wonder why Wellfleet nee Bay nee Nortel haven't already
>>taken over most of Cisco's market share for this reason given their
>>almost total embracement of SNMP for configuration and management.
>>Sure, they did leave a wide market niche for third party font-end tools
>>that actually worked, but at least they embraced the standards!  :-)
>Well, could it be because Cisco routers _work_?  :-)

Or that you don't have to use that piece of crap called Configuration Mangler 
to deal with the thing and then pay for upgrades to a version of configuration 
software that doesn't leave the equipment in a bad state.
                 Bryan C. Andregg * <bandregg at redhat.com> * Red Hat, Inc.

  1024/625FA2C5		F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77
  1024/0x46E7A8A2	46EB 61B1 71BD 2960 723C 38B6 21E4 23CC 46E7 A8A2

More information about the NANOG mailing list