Alex P. Rudnev
alex at Relcom.EU.net
Mon Sep 27 11:04:43 UTC 1999
Do not do the things too complex. The standart solution is route-pams
with prefix-based, as-path based and community-based matches - why don't
use it? Confederation schema have a lot of hidden stones inside.
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Robin DeFreitas wrote:
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 19:14:02 -0400
> From: Robin DeFreitas <rdsmf at atl.mediaone.net>
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: bgp design
> Does anyone know of any good books that specifically deal with BGP design !?
> I have a large OSPF network and plan to implement 4 internet access points
> at different parts of the network. I want to control traffic from certain
> areas to specific internet access points, but have redundancy to other
> internet access points in case the primary route is down. I was looking at
> implementing either route maps with attributes to prefer a certain path over
> the other or break my AS into Confederations. Is this a solid design plan or
> is there a better way of doing this ?
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
More information about the NANOG