ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
Phillip Vandry
vandry at Mlink.NET
Mon Oct 18 19:31:59 UTC 1999
> Yes, but...
>
> The first step doing any increase difficult was done when the
> HOST_NAME->IP_ADDRESS translation was chosen instead of
>
> HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT
>
> Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose.
Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere...
I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward
compatibility with SRV records?
-Phil
More information about the NANOG
mailing list