Regarding global BGP community values

Wed Oct 13 09:08:33 UTC 1999

> > work even when this leak disappeared... I don't blame the
> > software
> > designers, they must found the compromise between the stability,
> > time_to_implement, cost and memory,  but I'd like to highlight that they
> > really did not concerned
> > about such _cheap_ thing as memory at all). (let me to put -:) here).
> 
> On behalf of {myself, Paul, Ravi, Enke}, I assure you that Cisco's BGP has _always_ been
> worried about conserving memory.
BGP - yes, total architecture - not at all. Even very simple ensuranses
_don't allow the process eating already 90% of the memory to eat last 10%_
and _defragment the garbage_ was not realised, and if some (BGP for
example) process became crazy and over-eat something, not one can even
log-in and say _reload_ -:).


> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> 

Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)