PI space/filters question

Derek Balling dredd at megacity.org
Mon Nov 8 03:13:16 UTC 1999

FWIW, I should think that xDSL providers should be held to the same 
standards as Cable Internet providers. The similarities between the two 
(always-on, homes-passed, etc.) are enough that they should have the same 

If there is a difference in how they can get PI space, then that's 
something I think should be addressed. I don't think that trying to get the 
same methodology for address space assignments is "sneaky" really.

My opinion, no one else's. :)


At 06:57 PM 11/7/99 -0800, Steve Rubin wrote:

>On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 07:49:17PM -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> > However, I noticed that requirements for initial 24.* block allocation do
> > not specify existing allocations, and thought that sneaky way I might get
> > PI /20 by just specifying our approximate use in 6 months of the address
> > space.
> >
>...And since the ARIN folk read this mailing list, I suggest you change the
>name of your company before trying this now.  ;)
>Steve Rubin, Packet Monkey & Pilot  - ser at tch.org - http://www.tch.org/~ser/

More information about the NANOG mailing list