Is anyone actually USING IP QoS?
hank at ibm.net.il
Tue May 18 08:20:44 UTC 1999
At 00:01 18/05/99 -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
>Actually, the cost of undersea capacity is smaller than the
>cost of land capacity. For all i know, prices are being kept
>artificially high by parties i don't want to name (they
I agree that the prices are high. But as long as they are high, IP QoS and
all the other CoS stuff has a valid place on our toolbench. -Hank
>(Think cost of rights of way and that digging trenches
>is not that easy).
>Hank Nussbacher <hank at ibm.net.il> wrote:
>> You are merely showing your geocentricism by saying that bandwidth is
>> essentially free. That may be true in the USA but not in other countries
>> and especially not trans-Pacific or trans-Atlantic.
More information about the NANOG