Secondary DNS for Paraguay's TLD?
jared at puck.nether.net
Mon Mar 8 14:38:37 UTC 1999
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:20:24AM -0500, alex at nac.net wrote:
> > Anyone in a situation like this, I'm willing to do secondaries
> > for these sorts of domains, and plan to build a secondary-dns-server
> > engine that people would be able to send templates to, etc..
> Same here; nac.net would be willing to host any secondary DNS for anyone,
> specifically TLDs or foreign folks. Foreign to the US, that is :-)
> > IMHO, the internic should not allow any domains to have pri+sec nameserver
> > in the same /24
> Amen, except it can be misleading.
> NS1.NAC.NET 184.108.40.206
> NS2.NAC.NET 220.127.116.11
> NS6.NAC.NET 18.104.22.168
> Whilst 22.214.171.124 and .2 are on the same /24 (obviously), 207.99.0/24 is
> subnetted to 256 /32's, and routed to the machines. Why? So, when a
> machine/name-server moves within our network, it doesn't have to be
My point is that you're doing it correctly. If you lose
one of your aggregate blocks, it's not going to cause a problem. Like
for example, if someone else started to announce your /24 or a /19
with your dns servers in it.
You also distribute nameservers geographically, so if you
lose power in a location, you don't die.
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
More information about the NANOG