Smurfing and IP filtering
Alex P. Rudnev
alex at Relcom.EU.net
Thu Jan 14 10:30:01 UTC 1999
There is RFC recommendation for the router.
Why there is not RFC describing the policy (mandatory!) for the ISP?
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 21:50:21 -0500
> From: Steven J. Sobol <sjsobol at nacs.net>
> To: Scott McGrath <SMcGrath at YBP.com>
> Cc: Chris Cook <ccook at netasset.com>, nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Smurfing and IP filtering
> On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 02:19:47PM -0500, Scott McGrath wrote:
> > That would be a good starting point for the more sophisticated users however
> > most small networks have very uneven
> > clue distribution so I believe something in a FAQ format would be more
> > approachable to the small ISP/Network operator
> ...why not both?
> Cover configuration for, say, the top 5 brands of routers (which,
> realistically, should cover the majority of ISP's out there...)
> Steve Sobol [sjsobol at nacs.net]
> Part-time Support Droid [support at nacs.net]
> NACS Spaminator [abuse at nacs.net]
> Proud resident of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, the coolest place on earth.
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
More information about the NANOG