Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack
Jon Lewis
jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net
Tue Jan 12 07:58:37 UTC 1999
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Phil Howard wrote:
> OTOH, what about just declaring that X.X.X.{0,255} is off limits
> regardless of the network size? It would take just 2 access list
> entries to make those addresses in networks larger than /24 to be
Lots of smurf amps are smaller than /24, and there are plenty of networks
larger than /24.
----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net> | Spammers will be winnuked or
Network Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
Florida Digital Turnpike | to get the job done.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list