Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack

Jon Lewis jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net
Tue Jan 12 07:58:37 UTC 1999


On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Phil Howard wrote:

> OTOH, what about just declaring that X.X.X.{0,255} is off limits
> regardless of the network size?  It would take just 2 access list
> entries to make those addresses in networks larger than /24 to be

Lots of smurf amps are smaller than /24, and there are plenty of networks
larger than /24.  


----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
 Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net>  |  Spammers will be winnuked or 
 Network Administrator       |  nestea'd...whatever it takes
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  to get the job done.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________




More information about the NANOG mailing list