latency vs. packet loss
CMartin at mercury.balink.com
Wed Jan 13 22:58:42 UTC 1999
The question you pose cannot be answered as succinctly as you may think.
Various factors contribute to packet loss and latency - many of which
are completely unrelated. For example, if you purchase ATM CBR
connectivity from NY to Australia, you will see high latency, but
(assuming you are within your trffic contract) no packet loss. Here the
latency is due to propogation delay. Then again, you may have GigE
connectivity across the data center floor to a switching cluster
supporting a group of application servers that cannot handle the load
being delivered by the network. Here, there isn't much latency, but
there may be significant packet loss.
Also note that the traditional Poisson distribution that early queueing
theory was founded on is not always the best model for todays Internet.
Traffic patterns at exchange points are becoming more and more fractal
in nature, and new queuing technologies such as WRED coupled with rate
limiting technologies such as CAR, take your assumptions about available
bandwidth, switching latency, and queue/buffer depth and flush them down
The point is, this is a difficult question to answer. If I were to make
a VERY general assumption, however, I may be persuaded to agree with
your proposed correlation, although many would find objection to this
with evidence to substantiate their claim.
From: jzeeff at whs.verio.net [mailto:jzeeff at whs.verio.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 4:18 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: latency vs. packet loss
How well does latency correlate to packet loss on the Internet? For
example, if one were to pick one of several randomly placed sites on
the net based on lowest latency to/from point x, what percentage of
this time would this also yield the site with the lowest packet loss
to/from point x? My guess is that the correlation is high (due to
typical buffer sizes).
More information about the NANOG