spam whore, norcal-systems.net
ras at poppa.thick.net
Wed Feb 3 12:50:56 UTC 1999
I personally think you are pro-zac...
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Dean Anderson wrote:
> I take issue with being called pro-spam. It's kind of like calling anyone
> who thinks Clinton should be impeached anti-democrat, or perhaps
> I am pro-law. If you want to ban spam, there is a way to do that: People
> banned junk faxes, and banned telemarketers from calling your cell phone.
> However, they did that by passing laws. Not by taking the law into their
> own hands.
> Secondly, the internet isn't a lawless place. There are already laws which
> control how you must behave. Especially if you might have access to other
> peoples private electronic communications. We don't need more privacy
> laws. We just need to enforce those we have. Unfortunately, many people
> think they can do whatever they please. I suppose if the laws aren't
> enforced, then they are right.
> [note that I don't take issue with being called a nut ;-) I think Clinton
> should be impeached, too.]
> Plain Aviation, Inc dean at av8.com
> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com
I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras at poppa.thick.net
More information about the NANOG