vixie at mibh.net
Sun Dec 19 06:33:05 UTC 1999
dredd at megacity.org (Derek Balling) writes:
> I think (as I interpret the discussion) it is this way:
> Anyone can do whatever he wants with his/her mail server.
well, sort of. any mail server operator's freedom stops at the edge of
any other's. that is, a spammer cannot do whatever he/she wants with
his/her mail server since one of the things they want to do is connect
to my mail server and dump spam on me.
i think you meant "any mail server operator is free to reject any traffic
they want to reject, for any reason or for no reason." and i'd agree with
that formulation. but maybe that's not what you meant at all, because:
> The Network Operator can do whatever he wants with his network, BUT if the
> network provider has downstream customers, paying for internet
> connectivity, and the operator filters out part of that connectivity, then
> the operator has voided the contract (by filtering out a portion of the
> network the downstream may consider "important") in a manner that allows
> the downstream to bail out of any such contract. (I think such a filter
> could be considered "materially altering the service provided" although
because people in the service business are so liable for so many things,
they usually employ the services of actual, honest-to-god lawyers. and so,
when you visit a food-serving point of sale ("a restaurant") in california
you can usually learn by simply looking at the front door that they "reserve
the right to refuse service to anyone." and so, the transit contracts i've
signed (from either side) virtually all leave "wriggle room" for things like
running the MAPS (LLC) RBL (tm) in BGP mode on all backbone routers. of the
couple of worldwide ISP's i know of who do that, every one of them tells
their customers up front that they're doing it, and none of them seem to be
lacking for new customers.
but as JD also noted, there's a discrepency in the above summary. one thing
that mail server operators do increasingly often is to run the MAPS (LLC)
RBL (tm) in DNS mode. hotmail started doing this recently. this certainly
qualifies under the "allowed to refuse traffic for any reason or no reason"
formulation of the first policy, but seems to run afoul of the "filtering
out important destinations" rule described in the second policy.
pretty much what happens is that most ISP's are like california's restaurants
and they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone, including spammers.
Paul Vixie <vixie at mibh.net>
>> But what *IS* the internet?
> It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive
> symmetric closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP
> packet from". --Seth Breidbart
More information about the NANOG