more internic fun, and an idea

melinda b. thompson ima at
Wed Aug 4 15:01:52 UTC 1999

Mark Borchers dropped this into my mailbox:
>As frustrating as it can be to deal with InterNIC, objectively it
>should be noted that:
>(1) Your proposal would be costly to enforce because it would be
>necessary to determine whether the registrant submitted a correctly
>formed template so that culpability could be determined.
>(2) It wasn't that long ago that two-week processing was standard for
>a lot of domain transactions.  They raised the bar on themselves by
>improving turnaround time through automatic processing.  I'm not sure
>that they should now have to pay a price for that.

i used the same change template to move three domains, just changing the
domain names from one to the other. all other information was the same.

two went through automagically, the other i'm stil waiting for since jul17

perhaps the MOTIVATION of having to face penalties for not processing
changes using their own templates would increase services

btw, this domain prompted an email from internic in JULY reminding me that
they were going to bill me for renewal in they can send
billing notices MONTHS in advance, but can't process a simple ns server
change given over 2 weeks.

i said if they were that hard up for help to hire me.


life is a constant stream of people coming into and out of your life...
sometimes you get to grab hold of one or two of them for a while...
ima at  habit at  habit at  habit at

More information about the NANOG mailing list