Severe Response Degradation
twofsonet at graffiti.com
Wed Apr 28 15:16:03 UTC 1999
>> > well then, they're obviously clueless.
>> Hasn't this come up here before? I'm too lazy to go check the
>> archive, but I seem to remember a discussion of this topic. IIRC,
>> the reason/excuse given (lame or not) was that they use equipment
>> that does not deal well/at all with CIDR or VLSM or somesuch. Or
>> am I thinking of someone else?
>Well, all of their gear is Cisco. Last I checked, I think Cisco was OK
>with CIDR and VLSM, and even unnumbered links.
perhaps they need to be told about "ip classless"?
>As for the cluelessness statements, my take is that they've got some
>very clueful people, and some very clueless people. They've also got the
>inertia of a company many times their size. Perhaps that's appropriate,
>though, as they are now owned, at least in part, by AT&T (via the TCI
no offense to the clueful then. the clueless won't notice. :)
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior at daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet at graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew at crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
More information about the NANOG