Traffic exceeds link capacity.

Brian Horvitz horvitz at shore.net
Wed Sep 23 16:51:37 UTC 1998


We're not talking an aggregate number here are we?  Or is it that the
average in (or out) over the previous 5 minutes was greater than the speed
of the circuit?

  Brian

On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 alex at nac.net wrote:

> 
> > When the phenomenen occurs, the total inbound traffic of (B) and (C) 
> > shows near 45 mbps (about 43.x mbps).
> 
> > 
> > My question is:
> >    Is it true that it indicates 60~70 mbps ? (Of cause, it has many
> >    output drops.) or Is it bug?
> > 
> 
> 
> I recall this being a bug, I had a T1 that did 1.9 mb/s.
> 
> I recall 11.2.x or 11.1.21 fixing it.
> 
> 
> >    The cpu load increases upto 99%, and it freezes router for short
> >    time -about 1~2 minute-. How to resolve this errors ?
> > 
> > Our Router is:
> >    CISCO 7507
> >    RSP2
> >    IOS: 11.1.19 (CC)
> >    Enable CEF on (A): It is better than not using CEF. But the result
> >    doen't matter. (High CPU load, ..)
> > 
> > Any Idea ?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > 
> > --Jaeho Yang.
> > 
> 
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>    ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs.  October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA.
>     Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and
>     brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration.
> 
>      Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
>        Alex Rubenstein, alex at nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
>                Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
>      Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
>  Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> 
> 

---
Brian Horvitz
Shore.Net
Network Engineering




More information about the NANOG mailing list