CW....also CNN
Scott Gifford
sgifford at tir.com
Mon Oct 26 22:54:00 UTC 1998
We saw these same problems this morning, on some addresses that are
multihomed to CW and UUNet. UUNet recommended we announce our addresses
with longer prefixes for a few minutes, then withdraw the announcements.
Don't know why it worked, but it did...
Anyways, might be worth a try if you're getting hosed by this.
-------Scott.
>> Traffic from me to best.com looks like:
>>
>> traceroute to shell4.ba.best.com (206.184.139.135), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
>> 1 eth-0.cisco-1.intur.net (206.97.151.1) 2.106 ms 2.073 ms 2.088 ms
>> 2 border1-serial3-0.Dallas.cw.net (204.70.115.41) 72.321 ms 16.649 ms
203.451 ms
>> 3 core1-fddi-0.Dallas.cw.net (204.70.114.17) 4.789 ms 5.113 ms
10.839 ms
>> 4 bordercore1.SanFrancisco.cw.net (166.48.12.1) 72.705 ms 42.307 ms
41.859 ms
>> 5 best-internet.SanFrancisco.cw.net (166.48.13.250) 1001.36 ms 1052.2
ms 1010.41 ms
>> 6 core1-hssi8-0-0.mv.best.net (206.86.228.89) 979.218 ms 1007.01 ms
1000.45 ms
>> 7 shell4.ba.best.com (206.184.139.135) 1013.52 ms * 1018.15 ms
>
> This is still quest yes, the routes are getting from qwest to sprint
>then going on to uu.net.. it looks like its only happening in la tho..
maybe
>a bad filter?
>
> At this time I'm not seeing anyone leaking routes to me, including
>sprint.
>
>--
>Steven O. Noble -- Sr. Backbone Engineer, Exodus Communications (EXDS)
> -- Work:408.346.2333 --
> All my love to the Canadian Mooing Frog.
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list