CW....also CNN

Scott Gifford sgifford at tir.com
Mon Oct 26 22:54:00 UTC 1998


  We saw these same problems this morning, on some addresses that are
multihomed to CW and UUNet.  UUNet recommended we announce our addresses
with longer prefixes for a few minutes, then withdraw the announcements.
Don't know why it worked, but it did...

  Anyways, might be worth a try if you're getting hosed by this.

-------Scott.


>> Traffic from me to best.com looks like:
>>
>> traceroute to shell4.ba.best.com (206.184.139.135), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
>>  1  eth-0.cisco-1.intur.net (206.97.151.1)  2.106 ms  2.073 ms  2.088 ms
>>  2  border1-serial3-0.Dallas.cw.net (204.70.115.41)  72.321 ms  16.649 ms
203.451 ms
>>  3  core1-fddi-0.Dallas.cw.net (204.70.114.17)  4.789 ms  5.113 ms
10.839 ms
>>  4  bordercore1.SanFrancisco.cw.net (166.48.12.1)  72.705 ms  42.307 ms
41.859 ms
>>  5  best-internet.SanFrancisco.cw.net (166.48.13.250)  1001.36 ms  1052.2
ms  1010.41 ms
>>  6  core1-hssi8-0-0.mv.best.net (206.86.228.89)  979.218 ms  1007.01 ms
1000.45 ms
>>  7  shell4.ba.best.com (206.184.139.135)  1013.52 ms *  1018.15 ms
>
> This is still quest yes, the routes are getting from qwest to sprint
>then going on to uu.net.. it looks like its only happening in la tho..
maybe
>a bad filter?
>
> At this time I'm not seeing anyone leaking routes to me, including
>sprint.
>
>--
>Steven O. Noble -- Sr. Backbone Engineer, Exodus Communications (EXDS)
>                     --   Work:408.346.2333  --
>               All my love to the Canadian Mooing Frog.
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list