Maybe I'm misreading this but...

Sun Oct 18 18:30:37 UTC 1998

On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

> On 17 Oct 1998, Michael Shields wrote:
> 
> > In article <4.0.1.19981016224901.00de6240 at pariah.cncx.com>,
> > I Am Not An Isp <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> > > FACT: RFC1918 space does not break PMTU discovery.  Deal with it.
> > 
> > If you use RFC 1918 space on the Internet, PMTU very well may not work
> > for you.  You can place fault on whatever standard you like but that
> > doesn't change the *operational* issue.
> 
> 1) There is nothing inherient in the use of RFC 1918 space that will break
>    PMTU.

The only point I am trying to make is that while there is absolutely
nothing in using address space as defined in RFC-1918 that will break
PMTU-D, using 1918 addresses for public router interfaces which send
packets to public networks (in this case, the Internet) from that address
is outside the scope of what 1918 permits and can break things when
combined with other entirely legitimate and correct practices.

As a result, it is unwise to encourage people to use 1918 addresses in
such an inappropriate way.

Since everyone agrees on this, hopefully this thread can now rest.