Maybe I'm misreading this but...
Patrick Greenwell
patrick at namesecure.com
Sun Oct 18 14:36:58 UTC 1998
On 17 Oct 1998, Michael Shields wrote:
> In article <4.0.1.19981016224901.00de6240 at pariah.cncx.com>,
> I Am Not An Isp <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> > FACT: RFC1918 space does not break PMTU discovery. Deal with it.
>
> If you use RFC 1918 space on the Internet, PMTU very well may not work
> for you. You can place fault on whatever standard you like but that
> doesn't change the *operational* issue.
1) There is nothing inherient in the use of RFC 1918 space that will break
PMTU.
2) In the real world, many providers filter RFC 1918 space, which has
a good chance of breaking PMTU.
There, everyone is right. Can we all put our genitalia away and move on?
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list