Maybe I'm misreading this but...

Patrick Greenwell patrick at namesecure.com
Sun Oct 18 14:36:58 UTC 1998


On 17 Oct 1998, Michael Shields wrote:

> In article <4.0.1.19981016224901.00de6240 at pariah.cncx.com>,
> I Am Not An Isp <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> > FACT: RFC1918 space does not break PMTU discovery.  Deal with it.
> 
> If you use RFC 1918 space on the Internet, PMTU very well may not work
> for you.  You can place fault on whatever standard you like but that
> doesn't change the *operational* issue.

1) There is nothing inherient in the use of RFC 1918 space that will break
   PMTU.

2) In the real world, many providers filter RFC 1918 space, which has 
   a good chance of breaking PMTU.

There, everyone is right. Can we all put our genitalia away and move on?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell				         (800) 299-1288 v
			            CTO           	 (925) 377-1212 v
	                         NameSecure		 (925) 377-1414 f    
Coming to the ISPF?     The Forum for ISPs by ISPs       http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/





More information about the NANOG mailing list