IGPs in use
alex at nac.net
alex at nac.net
Fri Oct 16 04:48:40 UTC 1998
I'd have to definatly disagree.
IGP wise, EIGRP is easy and fast and it works. If ou need a *lot* of
interoperability, use OSPF.
Friends don't let friends use BGP as an IGP
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Megatron wrote:
>
> I would say the most interior Routing Protocol that is out there is
> BGP. It gives a better control of route announcements.
>
> -Megatron
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Andre' Zehl wrote:
>
> > > Is there an overview on what the dominantly used interior routing
> protocols are percentagewise in large AS backbones (IBGP, OSPF, IGRP,
> EIGRP, IS-IS, any?). I don't want to start religous wars on what's the
> best protocol, I'm rather interested if there is an overview available
> on the facts of protocols used. Is there an "objective"
> (vendor-independent) feature-based overview on the compared
> advantages/disadvantages (especially regarding redistribution) of the
> various protocols that goes with those numbers? > > Andre' > >
> zehl at berkom.de >
>
>
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs. October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA.
Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and
brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
Alex Rubenstein, alex at nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
More information about the NANOG
mailing list