IP allocations, renumbering, and RFC 2050
Andrew
aos at insync.net
Thu Oct 8 00:59:35 UTC 1998
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Scott Gifford wrote:
> A quick read through RFC 2050 (IP Allocation Guidelines) talks about
> this situation in section 2.1:
>
> The ISP
> should allow sufficient time for the renumbering process to be
> completed before the IP addresses are reused.
>
> However, the rep they spoke with at MCI/CW seems to feel that the moment the
> connection is cancelled, the IP addresses may be reassigned to another
> customer, and they should not expect a grace period for renumbering.
That portion of RFC 2050, I believe, refers to renumbering within the same
ISP, where it's reasonably easy to allow time for customers to renumber.
When a customer is moving from another ISP to you, they're pretty much SOL
when it comes to their old IPs.
--
Andrew O. Smith - <aos at insync.net> | "Revenge is so very sweet."
Sysadmin, Insync Internet Services | --Eric Cartman
Houston, Texas, USA |
More information about the NANOG
mailing list