Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue an

Patrick Greenwell patrick at namesecure.com
Thu Oct 1 16:26:08 UTC 1998


On 1 Oct 1998, Eric Gullichsen wrote:

> We are sorry to hear that you have been having problem with SPAM involving a
>.TO domain, and wish to draw your attention to the fact that .TO is the 
>*only* top level domain we know of with an explicit antispam policy. 

Nope. Both .NU and .CC do as well off the top of my head. 


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell				         (800) 299-1288 v
			            CTO           	 (925) 377-1212 v
	                         NameSecure		 (925) 377-1414 f    
Coming to the ISPF?     The Forum for ISPs by ISPs       http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/





More information about the NANOG mailing list