Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue an
Patrick Greenwell
patrick at namesecure.com
Thu Oct 1 16:26:08 UTC 1998
On 1 Oct 1998, Eric Gullichsen wrote:
> We are sorry to hear that you have been having problem with SPAM involving a
>.TO domain, and wish to draw your attention to the fact that .TO is the
>*only* top level domain we know of with an explicit antispam policy.
Nope. Both .NU and .CC do as well off the top of my head.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list