Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Thu Oct 1 00:48:44 UTC 1998
On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 05:16:50PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
> But as part of the whole picture, that Tonga's domain seems to be used
> as nothing but a "safe harbor" for porn sites engaged in criminal
> activity and even their own supposed govt consulate comes up as an ad
> for a software company etc, it would seem to indicate that this
> domain, .to, is not being used as a legitimate country TLD, is not
> being managed by the people it was assigned to for the purpose it was
> assigned, etc.
This raises a qustion I was hoping we could avoid for quite a long
time:
Who is in a position of authority to pass judgement on whether the
assigned authority over the .to top-level domain should "be allowed" to
register such people in it's domain? Is there a policy on the root
domain? Who enforces this? Who owns it?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff "The net is safer in bad weather: you
The Suncoast Freenet can't run a backhoe
Tampa Bay, Florida in a hurricane." (after Sean Donelan) +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list