AT&T/Sprint problems

Dan Rabb danr at dbn.net
Mon Nov 30 21:24:49 UTC 1998


Here's another one to sprintlink... this one looks good too.

traceroute to 199.0.232.90 (199.0.232.90), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  sl-gw5-nyc-5-1-1-6M.sprintlink.net (144.232.171.93)  1.435 ms  1.245 ms
1.18 ms
 2  sl-bb10-nyc-2-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.7.53)  1.229 ms  1.254 ms  1.143
ms
 3  sl-bb10-chi-3-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.8.202)  23.64 ms  23.673 ms
23.656 ms
 4  sl-bb4-chi-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.0.166)  24.333 ms  24.155 ms
24.177 ms
 5  144.228.252.13 (144.228.252.13)  25.052 ms  26.468 ms  25.29 ms
 6  144.228.158.202 (144.228.158.202)  67.511 ms  73.599 ms  80.131 ms
 7  tiny.sprintlink.net (199.0.232.90)  87.195 ms *  63.64 ms

Dan Rabb
digital broadcast network
dan at dbn.net


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Jim Dawson
Sent: Monday, November 30, 1998 2:56 PM
To: Chris Cappuccio
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: AT&T/Sprint problems


On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Chris Cappuccio wrote:

> I'm on AT&T, and I haven't noticed any unreachable sites... ELI maybe?

Nope -- here's another out our other pipe:

[ Mon Nov 30 12:40:50 ]
[ root at pdx-s01 -> traceroute postoffice.worldnet.att.net
traceroute to postoffice.worldnet.att.net (204.127.5.20), 30 hops max, 40
bytes
 1  ns.bytes.net (205.147.64.1)  54.959 ms  18.982 ms  19.484 ms
 2  cisco1.bytes.net (205.147.64.2)  19.213 ms  18.972 ms  29.649 ms
 3  border1-serial3-1.Seattle.cw.net (204.70.52.49)  58.715 ms  29.107 ms
74.8s
 4  border1-serial3-1.Seattle.cw.net (204.70.52.49)  33.812 ms !H *
39.391 ms H

Jim
  __________________________________________________________________
  Jim Dawson                                        jdawson at navi.net
  GCN Communications, Inc.                       http://www.navi.net
  618 NW Glisan St. Ste. 407                  voice: +1.503.641.1449
  Portland, Or  97209 USA                       fax: +1.503.641.3634
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



More information about the NANOG mailing list