NSI policy on lame delagations

Sun Nov 22 22:28:01 UTC 1998

On Sun, 22 Nov 1998, Randy Bush wrote:

> >>> The greater issue is that there is any implementation at all, when there
> >>> was none previously.
> >> your assertion is widely known to be false.
> > Thank you for your extremely helpful answer. Once again, since when has
> > NSI been enforcing such a policy? 
> 
> isi enforced it.  sri enforced it.  nsi enforced it when they took over from
> sri.  that they did not test for correct practice for a while does not make
> incorrect practice valid.

Who said anything about incorrect practices? My question was when did NSI
begin enforcing the policy. I am not upset at the lame delagation policy
at all. I am all for it. 

> welcome to the network slobs' mailing list.  where we winge and make excuses
> for half-assed practices, and excoriate and hurl innuendo at those who try
> to ensure correct practice.

Indeed. When are you going to stop?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell				         (800) 299-1288 v
			            CTO           	 (925) 377-1212 v
	                         NameSecure		 (925) 377-1414 f    
Coming to the ISPF-II?  The Forum for ISPs by ISPs       http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/