NSI policy on lame delagations

Sat Nov 21 02:07:45 UTC 1998

On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, Randy Bush wrote:

> > Seems that NSI has a new policy on lame delagations. I never heard
> > anything about this. Anyone else?
> 
> ancient policy, possibly new mechanism.
> 
> there should be no lame delegations.

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I knew the policy existed, but I
had never, until today heard of it being implemented in any way, shape, or
form. The last message from NSI I remember seeing stated something to the
effect that they never implemented it because there was not sufficient
community consensus on how to do so. I do not object to the implementation
of the policy in the slightest. 

What worries me is that policies might just start being implemented "all
of a sudden" without notification to the community, which is why I was
asking if anyone else was aware of any previous implementation of this
policy or announcement of same.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell				         (800) 299-1288 v
			            CTO           	 (925) 377-1212 v
	                         NameSecure		 (925) 377-1414 f    
Coming to the ISPF-II?  The Forum for ISPs by ISPs       http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/