Exodus: this is bad

Tue Nov 17 04:36:25 UTC 1998

I think he meant the compromised hosts, or the hosts that the attacks were
coming from, were all RH 5.1 with an old rev of BIND.  My 3.0-current box
with 8.1.2 handled it fine, as well.

At 22:30 11/16/98 -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
>
>> The attacked hosts have all exhibited the same characteristics: stock Red
>> Hat 5.1 install, running (probably) the stock named that came with it,
>
>Not entirely true.  I watched a FreeBSD 2.2.x/BIND 8.1.2 box get tickled
>harmlessy...
>
>Go to bed, porscanning twit kiddies.  It's late now, and Teletubbies ain't
>on. 8-)
>
>

William S. Duncanson                      caesar at starkreality.com
The driving force behind the NC is the belief that the companies who brought us
things like Unix, relational databases, and Windows can make an appliance that
is inexpensive and easy to use if they choose to do that.  -- Scott Adams 