WCCP talk..

alex at nac.net alex at nac.net
Wed Nov 11 04:16:03 UTC 1998


On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, lincoln dale wrote:

> >Your missing what I said. What if the cache continues sending WCCP
> >packets, but the cache itself has died?
> 
> i don't think i am --
> i would assume that the cache design would perform suitable sanity checks
> prior to sending out a heartbeat.  if the design is sound, the cache would
> not be capable of sending out WCCP packets if it has 'died' in some way.

You can't be serious.

A cache may check itself, but my arguement is that this self-checking
scheme may fail, seeing itself as alive, but not able to actually serve
requests.




-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex at nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




More information about the NANOG mailing list