WCCP talk..

alex at nac.net alex at nac.net
Wed Nov 11 04:05:00 UTC 1998


That I can accept.

But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure true and
absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own health.

My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other cache
manufacturers do it properly also?



> I haven't yet encountered a situation where the cache was having a problem
> and yet was still responding and talking WCCP to the router.
> 
> When our Cache Engines have experienced problems, they have removed
> themselves from the available pool or stopped responding to WCCP (which,
> in turn, caused them to be removed).
> 
> In short, I believe there's a very strong mechanism to check all
> functions of the cache before saying "hey, I'm okay here".
> 
> /cah
> 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex at nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




More information about the NANOG mailing list